Saturday October 4th 2003 About | My account | Log out | Help

Cities and Countries

EIU online store

Articles by subject
Economics A-Z
Style guide

Executive Thinking
Business Education

Full contents
Past issues

Free registration
Web subscriptions
Print subscriptions
Academic offers
Gift vouchers
Mobile editions
E-mail alerts

Business education, recruitment, business and personal: click here
The Economist
Global Agenda
Contact us
Media Directory
Advertising info
Job opportunities


Printable page

E-mail this
Get e-mail alerts

The rise of the Eurosceptiques
Oct 2nd 2003
From The Economist print edition

The French are increasingly ambivalent about Europe—and their place in it

TIME was, Europe served as a useful device for French politicians. It enabled them to impose unpopular reforms—privatisation, energy liberalisation, cuts to farm subsidies—in the name of a popular, greater European, good. But an increasingly prickly relationship between France and the European Commission has begun to produce an uncomfortable sensation: is French Euroscepticism on the rise?

The immediate cause of the spat with the commission turns on the government's budget deficit for 2004. In the budget unveiled last week by Francis Mer, the finance minister, France plans in 2004 to exceed the 3% limit imposed by the European Union's stability pact for the third year running, this time reaching 3.6%. Despite scolding, France says it will not make further changes to bring the deficit into line by October 3rd, as requested by European finance ministers. They must then decide whether to start the procedure for punishing France, which could end in a fine. The irritation in Brussels is palpable: the French understanding of rules, goes a widespread feeling, is that they apply to everybody else.

From The Economist
Europe's constitution
Oct 2nd 2003
State aid in Europe
Sep 25th 2003
Europe and NATO
Sep 25th 2003
Europe, America and Iraq
Sep 19th 2003
European government finances
Sep 2nd 2003
France's battle for reform
Jun 26th 2003
France and the common agricultural policy
Jun 19th 2003
France's Socialists
May 22nd 2003
Who speaks for Europe?
Feb 6th 2003

Country Briefing

The prime minister and the Ministry of Economics, Finance and Industry give budget and economic information. The European Commission's economics and financial affairs department posts economic statistics and indicators for member countries and details the stability and growth pact. The EU gives information on enlargement, state aid, foreign and security policies and the proposed constitution. The French presidency publishes statements by Mr Chirac. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs posts press releases on Iraq and other foreign-policy issues. The Centre for European Reform, a think-tank, publishes research and policy briefs on EU economic policy.

Also in Global Agenda
George Bush and Iraq Oct 3rd 2003
Airline consolidation Oct 2nd 2003
Taiwan and China Oct 2nd 2003
Britain's Labour government Oct 1st 2003
The Catholic church Oct 1st 2003
The Buttonwood column Sep 30th 2003


For their part, the French are exasperated by what they regard as a narrow-minded Brussels obsession with such rules and an inflexible disregard for the broader picture. The government of Jean-Pierre Raffarin, the prime minister, has bent over backwards in the past month, argue its officials, to bring the deficit under control. Yes, it has been clumsy and careless in its choice of words, declaring breezily that France had other priorities than controlling the deficit (Mr Mer) or solving mathematical problems to the satisfaction of others (Mr Raffarin). But it has delivered a budget that freezes spending and reduces the structural deficit by 0.7%, not far off the 1% cut that EU finance ministers wanted.

France feels bossed about by Brussels in other ways too. The commission threatened, for instance, to block the government's recent bail-out of Alstom, an engineering group, approving a rescue plan only after France agreed to last-minute changes. It is now demanding the overdue repayment of loans the government made last year to Bull, a computer group.

On top of this, French unease about the implications of the EU's enlargement is growing too. The fear is that a Europe of 25 will turn into little more than an economic zone, less glued together politically, and in which France will struggle to retain its traditional influence as Germany looks east. The French are the most hostile of all EU nationalities to enlargement, with only 31% in favour and 54% against, according to Eurobarometer's poll last spring. This disquiet has fed into a general French glumness, reflected in a recent clutch of much-discussed books. “Europe is no longer, or less and less, seductive,” laments a recent editorial in Le Monde.

The upshot of all this is threefold. First, and in the short run, the French government is trying to persuade the commission that it is in its own interests not to fan Euro-hostility by imposing further spending cuts for 2004. “We need Brussels to understand”, says one official, “that Europe as an idea will suffer if they insist.” Whether or not the commission buys this, the strategy of using Brussels to enforce domestic French reform may have run its course.

The second is a deepening ambivalence about the wisdom of holding a referendum on the EU’s new constitution. In the past, President Jacques Chirac has promised that it would be “ratified by the people”. This view has now been softened to simply a “preference” for a referendum. The blunt realisation is taking hold that the French might well say no.

French scepticism is far weaker than in Britain, where only 30% now say EU membership is “a good thing”, next to 50% of the French and 54% in the Union as a whole. But support has slipped from a year ago. And nobody forgets that the French approved the Maastricht treaty by only a bee's whisker. Moreover, the ruling Union for a Popular Movement is divided over the matter—as is the opposition Socialist Party. There would be plenty of sceptical voices in any referendum campaign.

The third upshot is a reinforced sense of urgency within the Elysée over the need to forge ahead with a “pioneering group”, to use Mr Chirac's preferred term. Officially, the point is to strengthen the heart of Europe, in areas such as defence, among those countries that wish to participate. But the project is also an attempt to preserve French influence in an enlarged Europe and to fortify Europe as an alternative hub of power to the United States.

It is unclear whether any of this, even if feasible, will stem the Euro-disaffection in France. Do the French really want “more Europe” as a response to their growing disillusion? Perhaps, if the outcome is renewed French influence. Mr Chirac's stand against the war in Iraq was hugely popular in a France that feared it had lost its global voice. Yet the risk is high. According to polls, those most worried about enlargement are the elderly, those in north and eastern France, and the least educated: precisely the recruiting ground for France's most Eurosceptical politician of all, the far-right National Front's Jean-Marie Le Pen.


Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2003. All rights reserved.
Legal disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Help

Mobile editionsE-mailSubscribeEmail and Mobile EditionsHelp